Skip to main content

Could TV watching be good for us?

I recently wrote a post citing a study that reading fiction makes a person more empathetic because they can imagine themselves in the position of the characters they are reading about. These skills then become transferable to a person's real life when they interact with others. How about other forms of fiction, however, such as watching a TV drama? We have long been told that watching TV rots our brain, but could TV actually be good for us?

Some studies suggest that TV could indeed be good for us, though to be fair most of these studies are cited by Bustle and HuffPost, so make of them what you will. The most convincing argument I could find for why TV watching is good for us is that TV watching helps decrease levels of cortisol - the hormone associated with stress - especially in women. Researchers speculate that this is because TV watching is a passive activity that gives people a break from their over-scheduled days. This ability to disengage and de-stress actually makes us more likely to exercise self-discipline and self-control in other aspects of our lives. This is because abstaining from things we find pleasurable is hard and often requires external motivators. The reward of watching a favorite TV show at the end of the day may actually encourage us to go to the gym or stick to a diet. Other studies find that watching TV boosts our creativity. When we watch show with fantastical worlds, like Game of Thrones, our minds expand beyond the normal realms of reality sparking our imagination and encouraging creative thought. Moderate amounts of ambient background noise, like the music in a coffee shop, have also been found to encourage creative thinking. This is because silence helps us focus. While focus is good for certain tasks, it actually discourages abstract thinking. In other words, silence may be good for helping you do your taxes, but if you want to write the next great American novel, putting on a repeat episode of your favorite TV show in the background may help. On the other hand, putting on background music, may be equally as useful. Other studies, which I find much more dubious, point to the fact that TV can be educational. Shows such as Grey's Anatomy often contain accurate bits of medical information. Researchers argue that people watching these shows become better informed and more conscious about their health and lifestyle choices. While this may be true in some cases, I think it is safe to conclude that watching TV for informative purposes is not one's best course of action.

If TV watching has all these benefits, then why is it often thought of as bad for us? First of all, TV watching can lead to a sedentary lifestyle and being overweight, which is closely tied to diabetes and heart related problems. In addition, watching TV encourages unhealthy eating habits - both because of the unhealthy food that is advertised on TV and people's tendency to snack while watching TV. Not only is TV bad for our physical health, but physical activity has been shown to increase brain health. When we stop leading an active lifestyle our cognitive functioning decreases. The impact of TV on a person's cognitive health is even more detrimental in children below the age of two. TV watching can often cause speech delays. As anyone who has learned a new language can attest, language acquisition requires one to engage in conversation in the language one is trying to learn. When very young children watch TV, they are not actively engaging in dialogue. Thus, delaying their ability to acquire language. Children are not the only ones, however, who do not engage in conversation when parked in front of a television. Unsurprisingly, adults who spend greater amounts of time in front of the TV also experience higher rates of social isolation, which is liked to depression. Finally, in addition to being harmful to our physical, mental and social health, TV is also bad for our financial health. Companies spend millions of dollars on advertisements because advertisements cause us to spend more money. Thus, while it may not always be harmful to watch television, limiting the time one spends in front of the TV is probably wise.

Perhaps the old adage is true - everything in moderation, including moderation.

To get in your moderate amount of internet surfing for the week subscribe to the Koo Review or check back next Monday for a new blog post.


Popular posts from this blog

9 Core Values to Help Disciplined People to Steadily Build Wealth

This post is for people who are self-disciplined and looking to invest money outside of their employer sponsored retirement plans.  It is also for those who are aspiring to find ways to generate passive income.

As an educator in New York City, we are provided an employer sponsored 403-b called the Tax Deferred Annuity (or TDA for short).  For more information on it, I wrote about some of my observations about educators and retirement in an earlier article called A little bit goes a long way. 

For those who are not familiar with TDA, it offers a variety of investment options but the most promising is the guaranteed returned fix rate for UFT members at 7% annually, and 8.25% for all other members. The maximum contribution that an individual can make is $18,000 for the year, which is similar to a traditional IRA for everyone else.

If you find yourself in a unique situation where you still have money to invest then I would like to share some of my own ideas that I have put into practice.…

Influence People

Today we continue exploring Dale Carnegie's book How to Win Friends and Influence People.  The first part of this two series post was on How to make friends which you can check out by clicking the link below:

How to make friends

The other portion of this text is about influencing people.  If you'd like to read all the points that Dale Carnegie suggests, wikipedia does a nice job of laying it out in an easy to read format in the link below.

While Mr. Carnegie lists out twelve key points to winning people over to your way of thinking, I'd like hone in on a few of his points that in my opinion are the most important.  I think because these points feel so counterintuitive that it becomes difficult to understand how these points could be valid.

Nonetheless, I would like to share my thoughts with you on these few ideas and pair them with a brief anecdotal.  Then you can be the judge and determine its merits or…

7 Key Traits Required For Stock Selection.

In Chapter 14 of Benjamin Graham's The Intelligent Investor, he focuses on the 7 items for defensive stock selection.

In the preface, this chapter is highlighted by Warren Buffett as one of the keynote chapters, and therefore the reader should pay special attention to the advice that Graham offers.

For those who are unfamiliar with Benjamin Graham he was a former fund manager, professor, and is considered the father of value investing.  Value investing is a strategy where stocks are purchased at less than their intrinsic value.  Intrinsic value in layman's terms is the amount the company is worth (Assets - Liabilities = Worth).

By the way, the equation above is not the actual method for finding intrinsic value, it is just a gross oversimplification of what it means.  I would also like to note that intrinsic value is different than the stock price.  The stock price is what the market is valuing the company at, but it may not reflect its intrinsic value.

For example: 

Let's …